Newer Posts →

Impact of Obergefell v. Hodges Decision on Kentucky Cities
Posted on December 12, 2016 by Andrea Shindlebower in Same-Sex Marriage

Impact of Obergefell v. Hodges Decision on Kentucky Cities

Impact of Obergefell v. Hodges Decision on Kentucky Cities 

On Friday, June 26,2016 the United States Supreme Court ruled that same-sex marriage is a fundamental right under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.  So what does that mean for city governments in Kentucky? 

The decision reaffirms the February 25, 2015 Department of Labor Final Rule revising the regulatory definition of spouse under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA).  This amendment to the rule provided that same sex-spouses must be treated the same as opposite-sex spouses under the Family Medical Leave Act.  For example, the DOL Final Rule and the Supreme Court ruling will allow eligible employees to take FMLA leave to care for their same-sex spouse with a serious health condition and to take qualifying exigency leave if a same-sex spouse is being deployed for military duty. 

Therefore, cities that are required to provide FMLA to eligible employees (i.e., those cities with 50 or more employees) need to make sure their FMLA policies conform to this change and that administrative staff are properly trained to properly apply the policy.    . 

Other impacts based on this decision include the following:

  • Employee handbooks: Cities should review and update all employee handbooks, policies, and procedures to extend to same-sex spouses the same rights given to opposite-sex spouses.
  • Taxes: Because same-sex couples can now file their state and federal taxes jointly, employers may need to update their W-4 forms to account for their change in status.
  • Other benefits: Discretionary benefits extended by cities, such as bereavement and sick leave, must be applied uniformly to all legally married couples.
  • COBRA: Same-sex spouses are now also covered by COBRA.
  • Pensions, qualified retirement accounts, and IRAs: Employers may need to allow employees to change their beneficiary designations.
  • Employee benefits:  Employees may now be eligible for employer-provided fringe benefits like health insurance. 

Obergefell is not an employment law case and does not directly implicate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  While the Civil Rights Act does not specifically prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity/expression, gender stereotyping, harassment, and the discrimination of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) individuals may still give rise to a gender discrimination claim under Title VII. In addition, this decision will not impact “Fairness” ordinances that some cities have adopted that provide additional protections for LGBT individuals against discrimination, such as in housing practices and employment decisions.

For additional information or questions on the Obergefell decision or for sample policies, contact Andrea Shindlebower, Personnel Services Specialist with the KLC Member Legal Services Department.


Time to Take Your Tourism Commission in for a Tune-Up
Posted on December 12, 2016 by Laura Ross in Tourism Commissions

Time to Take Your Tourism Commission in for a Tune-Up

It has been almost 50 years since the first Kentucky statutes authorizing local tourism and convention commissions (TCCs) were enacted.  Since 1968, the numerous amendments to these laws show that the General Assembly has revisited them many times.  Unfortunately, many cities can't say the same.  Some TCCs have existed for decades without oversight and direction from the local governments that created them. 

Think about it:  If you buy a car, and never consult the operator's manual or take it in for service, would you expect it to take you where you want to go?  Would you take your hands off the wheel and hope for the best?

TCCs can be an effective vehicle city governments can use to promote their communities, but only if city officials and TCC members all have a clear understanding of how the commission is supposed to work. 

So let's dust off the statutes and your local ordinances, and start by taking a look at the fuel that keeps the whole thing running:  the money.  State law establishes certain funding and financial requirements, but also leaves some decisions to the local government that created the TCC.  It's important to know the difference.

KRS 91A.390 is the statute that largely governs tourism revenue, including where it comes from and how it is distributed.  Here are some of the basic rules you need to know to comply with the law.  (NOTE:  Consolidated local governments, urban county governments, and multicounty TCCs may have different requirements and should consult the statute.)

1) Annually, every TCC must submit a request for operating funds to the local governing body or bodies that established it.  This is a mandatory, and very important, part of the funding process.  While the local government is required to include the TCC in its annual budget, it needs the TCC's request to be submitted before the budget is enacted so that it can consider the TCC's needs when allocating funds.

2) The legislative body of the local government(s) that established the TCC is required to enact a transient room tax, and use revenue from this tax to fund the TCC.  The tax rate cannot exceed three percent.  If the legislative body wishes, it can impose an additional special transient room tax of up to one percent to fund operating expenses of a convention center. 

3) The local government body or bodies must enact an ordinance providing for enforcement and monthly collection of the transient room tax.  The details of who collects the tax and how it is enforced are completely within the discretion of the local government.  While a TCC is required by statute to have its own treasurer to manage the funds allocated to it, the law does not require the TCC to be the collection agent, so cities may feel free to collect the tax themselves.  However, there is one limit on collections:  hotel and motel operators who are subject to the tax may not receive a collection fee for collecting the tax.

4) In addition to funding the operation of the TCC, transient room tax revenue can also be used to fund costs associated with acquiring and operating facilities that are useful in promoting tourism and convention business.  The statute requires the local governing body to determine the amount to be used for this purpose, with the advice and consent of the TCC. 

5) The remaining balance of the transient room tax revenue must be used only for developing and promoting convention and tourist activities and facilities.  It is important to note that, unlike restaurant tax revenue discussed below, the law does not require the transient room tax revenue balance to be turned over to the TCC.  This means the local governing body could itself utilize the remaining balance, as long as it is using the money for tourism-related purposes.  However, the transient room tax proceeds may not be used to subsidize any hotel, motel, or restaurant.

6) If the TCC does not spend all of the funds allocated to it during the fiscal year, the money must be used to make up part of the TCC's budget for the following year. 

7) In addition to the transient room tax, cities formerly classified as fourth or fifth class as of January 1, 2014 may enact a restaurant tax to provide tourism revenue (check the Department for Local Government registry for qualifying cities).  The tax may not exceed three percent of the retail sales of all restaurants in the city.  Unlike the transient room tax, money collected from the restaurant tax must be turned over to the TCC.  Any portion of an ordinance that restricts the use of the tax revenue is in danger of being voided by a court.  However, cities and TCCs can and do enter into consensual agreements regarding how the revenue will be spent. 

8) All money collected from both the transient room tax and the restaurant tax must be kept in a separate account.

Ultimately, it is important that city officials recognize that TCCs are creatures of city governments, funded primarily by city tax dollars.  As such, the city has the responsibility to ensure its tax revenue is properly managed and its TCC continues to be a valuable resource for the community. 

So there's your TCC finance tune-up.  Get in the driver's seat, and see how far your city can go. 


Open Record and Open Meeting Opinions
Posted on December 12, 2016 by Laura Ross in Open Meetings/Open Records

The KLC Legal Team is compiling quarterly updates of the Kentucky Attorney General Opinions, as well as Open Record and Open Meeting Opinions

Office of the Attorney General (OAG) Quarterly Summary from KLC

As an additional service to members, KLC Member Legal Services attorney Chris Johnson has summarized recent Kentucky Attorney General opinions that are relevant to cities.  

First and Second Quarter Summaries 

KLC Member Legal Services also provides an ongoing list of frequently asked questions (FAQs) on the KLC website. 

For specific questions or more information, contact the KLC Member Legal Services team at 800.876.4552. 


Newer Posts →